Image Courtesy of TMC Library >> Posted on August 23, 2024 by Joanne Romano 

Journal Citation Reports

• Find Reliable, and Avoid Predatory, Publishers 

  • You want to publish your paper, and it’s been accepted by a publisher you’ve never heard of before.  Be warned!  Predatory publishers are very adept at appearing legitimate.

• Journal Citation Reports

  The world's leading journals and publisher-neutral data. Comprehensive evaluation and assessment package: Journal indexing.

• OSI Brief: Deceptive publishing (more commonly known as “predatory publishing”)

  Deceptive publishing (more commonly known as “predatory publishing”) is an important and troubling issue in scholarly communication. However, its parameters and seriousness are a matter of controversy, and there is not yet any consensus as to how big an issue it is, how fast it is growing, the variety of its manifestations, and what (if anything) can be done to combat it. The broad outlines of deceptive publishing, as described in this brief, are clearer than its exact details.

• Predatory Publishing: Identifying Predatory Publishers

  Predatory publishers will often go to great lengths to market their perceived credibility. Predatory publishing, also write-only publishing[1][2] or deceptive publishing,[3] is an exploitative academic publishing business model that involves charging publication fees to authors without checking articles for quality and legitimacy, and without providing editorial and publishing services that legitimate academic journals provide, whether open access or not. The phenomenon of "open access predatory publishers" was first noticed by Jeffrey Beall, when he described "publishers that are ready to publish any article for payment".[4] However, criticisms about the label "predatory" have been raised.[5] A lengthy review of the controversy started by Beall appears in The Journal of Academic Librarianship.[6] .... From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

• Is predatory publishing a real threat? Evidence from a large database study

  Using a database of potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access journals, the objective of this research is to study the penetration of predatory publications in the Brazilian academic system and the profile of authors in a cross-section empirical study. Based on a massive amount of publications from Brazilian researchers of all disciplines during the 2000–2015 period, we were able to analyze the extent of predatory publications using an econometric modeling. Descriptive statistics indicate that predatory publications represent a small overall proportion, but grew exponentially in the last 5 years. Departing from prior studies, our analysis shows that experienced researchers with a high number of non-indexed publications and PhD obtained locally are more likely to publish in predatory journals. Further analysis shows that once a journal regarded as predatory is listed in the local ranking system, the Qualis, it starts to receive more publications than non-predatory ones.